Why Would Planned Parenthood Even Want to Force Its Way Into Our Community?

The Pasco Planning Commission voted to postpone its decision on the Planned Parenthood permit out of fear of a lawsuit.

The question nobody has asked, however, is: why would PP resort to such an extreme measure to try to force itself on the community of Pasco?

If their own propaganda is to be believed, their mission is to help the communities they are in, not to push some ideological agenda, or make money.

But if the people of Pasco, through their representatives, have said "Thanks, but no thanks", wouldn't you expect a polite person to realize it's time to say, "OK, goodbye"?

There are only 3 possible explanations:
1) It IS about the money. I.e., just like a private, for-profit corporation, like an asphalt company, PP sees the chance to make money and is going to do what it has to in order to see those profits realized.
2) It is about ideology: PP wants to bring their radical agenda of abortion on demand, sexualization of minors, and the complete extrication of morality from sexuality to this community.
3) They truly believe they are offering something that will serve the greater good that the community is too ignorant to understand.

There are certainly cases where a community can reject a new organization moving in even though it does serve the greater good. Think of a sewage treatment plant. It may be that nobody wants it near their house or property, but everyone agrees in principle that it's good and necessary. So the question is: in what ways is Planned Parenthood like a sewage treatment plant?

Does PP provide some benefit to any of the communities that it's in that is profound and compelling? We've already explained that Washington State Planned Parenthoods poison communities in the following ways:

• They murder thousdands of innocent babies,
  
• They have been widely accused of facilitating rape and sexual abuse,
  
• They've caused women years of emotional trauma and psychological damage because of abortions they were pressured or tricked into,
  
• They're being investigated for millions of dollars in fraud and stealing from taxpayers,
  
• They've slandered and tried to undermine true non-profit pregnancy centers that help women with non-homicidal medical care, and
  
• They've worked to outlaw abstinence-based education.
  
• And they've made millions of dollars in the process.
  

But does the supposedly "good" work they claim to do outweigh all this? By good work, they mean providing low-cost medical care to women with STDs, and low-cost STD and pregnancy prevention?

Well, we already know that there are many other existing options for the low-cost medical care. So how about the prevention? Well, we've already shown that there is simply no data anywhere in Washington State to support the notion that PP's presence in a community leads to fewer abortions, or fewer STDs. PP of Western Washington has 23 clinics and yet they are doing 50% more abortions than just 3 years ago. PP Kennewick has been around a long time, and the Benton County chlamydia rate just jumped almost 40% from 2007 to 2008.

So we can rule out option number 3 as a possible explanation for why PP of Central Washington would try to force their way into the Pasco community as extremely unwelcome guests. That just leaves options 1 and 2.